Inverted rear wing?

scary steve said:
I've got more where that came from...

How about a nitrous-style system that instead of injecting a jet of funny-gas into the intake, injects a spray of diesel into the rear-wheel-arch, resulting in a loss of traction AND a massive cloud of impressive smoke? :D

Some of you may remember when we sprayed my old Hachi's rear Yokos with tyre-shine at Turweston a few years back?

Still couldn't drift for $h!£, but I had fun trying :D

I'll get me coat again...

Scary


Bit like a certain old rally car that used a water spray to get round them round breaking back axle due amount of grip and power.
What car have you got all these mad ideas for?
Heard soaking tyres in bleach and oil breaks down the rubber compound so when you use them they create lots of smoke
Alex
 
Trouble with rear spoilers is you get a trade of between downforce and drag. I think this reflects in the relatively poor drag coefficient of Skylines. I doubt the bulk of production car spoilers are all that effective at all in terms of downforce because if they were to generate a lot of downforce it would mean an increase in drag and subsequent drop in fuel economy. Aftermarket spoilers offer improved efficiency but are probably not needed on the majority of cars. If the car is able to put the power down and is stable then no real benefit to be had.

I know when I fitted a front spoiler to my 510 it had an incredible effect on stability at 130mph+. The car felt absolutely rock solid compared to how it did without it. Unfortunately, I discovered another trade off shortly after fitting it...it caused the front brakes to run very hot on the track...bugger :wack:
 
96dennis96 said:
off to call greenpeace :wack:

lol! oops, typo of dyslexia :smash:


Basically to make a car generate lift, look at how it creates down force and reverse these systems, it is quite simple :nod: if you know how they generate downforce :smash: all i'll say before i get banned! :smash:
 
Ratdat said:
Trouble with rear spoilers is you get a trade of between downforce and drag. I think this reflects in the relatively poor drag coefficient of Skylines. I doubt the bulk of production car spoilers are all that effective at all in terms of downforce because if they were to generate a lot of downforce it would mean an increase in drag and subsequent drop in fuel economy. Aftermarket spoilers offer improved efficiency but are probably not needed on the majority of cars. If the car is able to put the power down and is stable then no real benefit to be had.

I know when I fitted a front spoiler to my 510 it had an incredible effect on stability at 130mph+. The car felt absolutely rock solid compared to how it did without it. Unfortunately, I discovered another trade off shortly after fitting it...it caused the front brakes to run very hot on the track...bugger :wack:

the front lip would have only reduced the air flow under the car thus the overall effect of lift the cars shape creates is reduced. but as you say, the air is often used to cool the sump, brakes and exhaust. why didn’t you add break ducts? did you see a change in water/engine temps after fitting the part?

most road cars don’t have wings. they have spoilers. their main function is to 'spoil' the air flow over the car. they make sure the air leaving the tail of the car doesn’t join up with the air that went under the car. this creates drag but it also keeps the car on the ground. the s13 spoiler is one of these.
mini wings like on the e36 m3 are too small to do anything useful. they are more likely to be there to act like spoilers than wings. also for a wing to work and produce lift (negative lift for car wings) you need space around the longer side of the wing.
so a tiny little wing on the back of an m3 with about 2inches of space between it and the boot lid is useless as a wing. no lift to be had here.

a wing needs to be mounted either high up or off the back of the car. this gives it the space it needs below the wing to move the air that creates the lift.

Bon Bon said:
So at what speed would you say a rear aerofoil becomes affective? I reckon at motorway speeds they can have a significant affect, certainly did make a difference to the stability or my mates E36 M3 having a rear spoiler around the Nurburgring.

Remember, on the Skyline for example, 80kg of downforce is a LOT...because the car will generate lift, so first the wing is counteracting the lift, then adding downforce.

However inverted wings wouldn't work, especially once the airflow was redirected once the car went sideways, but, it's an excuse to argue....... :wack: :wack:

around 80mph is when most smaller wings become useful. if you had a huge wing with a long surface then it would work at much lower speeds. they also need clean air. if there is turbulence then there is little benefit to be had from the wing.

an inverted wing would work. lift is lift. if you turn the wing up the other way it will still work. so long as there is space for it to move the air. but the low speed of drifting and the sideways action of the car doesn’t help. a massive 'V' shaped wing on the tail could create lift at speeds above about 30mph. but it would need to be quite a big wing and would look very odd indeed. i spose some drifting is much faster than 30, so a wing that worked at 50 would be much smaller and you could add extra elements to the wing to help double up the effect it has. but you would need to mount it quite high up to get clean air to help reduce the size of the wing.

another way would be to add smaller wings to the sides of the car. there is a fair bit of air flow down the sides and they are high pressure areas. this means there is more air in a set space to create lift from. this plus a smaller rear mounted wing could get you more lift.

how much lift is needed to help the rear tyres lose grip? and would lift really help? if you flick into a drift at 80mph and then the rear wheels don’t have enough grip to stop sliding straight on, you may not be able to catch the drift.

i spose if you only want to remove some of the weight from the rear, then a small wing setup may give you just that little bit of a helping hand. but its defo not worth the effort if you haven’t removed all the weight from the rear of the car that would can.
do you really need them big lights with all their bulbs and glass? cant you just use LED's. they are much lighter and use less power. it would also help the alternator work less hard and free up some power for the wheels. not much tho. every little helps eh.
how about plexi glass for the rear window and rear sides? might be a bit of a security issue if you use your drift car on the road. and then you still have the rear hatch/boot lid made of steel. dump it and get some light composites.

playing with the aerodynamics of your car to create less rear end grip could land you in a world of trouble at motorway speeds if you use your drift car on the road. 90mph and a 30mph head wind.. doomed.

L.
 
i cant belive your having a disscussion from a post thats obviously a pisstake :rolleyes:

scary steve chalmers anyone? fast car mag, now redline... he'll be telling us the benefits on neon washers next, will you disscuss that too? :smash:
 
mittomatto said:
i cant belive your having a disscussion from a post thats obviously a pisstake :rolleyes:

scary steve chalmers anyone? fast car mag, now redline... he'll be telling us the benefits on neon washers next, will you disscuss that too? :smash:

they add weight, look crap and drain power from your engine (a little). thus they are crap. :D

L.
 
mittomatto said:
i cant belive your having a disscussion from a post thats obviously a pisstake :rolleyes:

scary steve chalmers anyone? fast car mag, now redline... he'll be telling us the benefits on neon washers next, will you disscuss that too? :smash:

yeah, and the response will be

"Nob off"


Plus the topic on the wing interests me anyway from my uni days, be it a stupid idea or not.
 
mittomatto said:
i cant belive your having a disscussion from a post thats obviously a pisstake :rolleyes:

scary steve chalmers anyone? fast car mag, now redline... he'll be telling us the benefits on neon washers next, will you disscuss that too? :smash:


Matt old mate, the magazine I'm working on isn't Redline! They just happened to send me to Tokyo with Redline's editor Renton. :)

Some of you on here know EXACTLY what I'm up to, don't you chaps? :thumbs:

And no, it's not a piss-take. Creating lift over the rear wheels should theoretically make it easier to drift - hence the indepth answers.

Just because you didn't know the answer in the first place :D :D :D

Love you, miss you,

Scary
 
LDA said:
the front lip would have only reduced the air flow under the car thus the overall effect of lift the cars shape creates is reduced. but as you say, the air is often used to cool the sump, brakes and exhaust. why didn’t you add break ducts? did you see a change in water/engine temps after fitting the part?

Hehe, I do know what it does :rolleyes: Where the supirse came was that it was so effective on an old car with an awful Cd of .45.
I never added brake ducts because the thing didn't stay on the car for long. GRP front spoilers and cones on an airfield don't mix :cry: I never replaced it as track speeds were never high enough to warrent it really and I'd stopped using the car on the road by then.
There was no change to running temperatures with it fitted. The car has an undertray under the front as standard to stop air that's forced under the car from disturbing airflow through the rad.
 
Of course the standard E36 spoiler doesn't do anything for downforce, but it's not a standard E36 M3, it's running a silly looking GT wing but it certainly does improve stability at high speeds. :p The standard wing is like you say just a spoiler to reduce lift and tidy up the airflow, along with the rear bumper splitters, etc.

I really don't think it would work, because the amount of lift would vary wildly depending on angle of car, wind, etc if you used a wing that was effective enough to make any difference. It's a shit dangerous idea :p
 
A "wing" to create downforce is pretty much the same design as an aeroplane wing but upside down. Therefore if u were to turn it over it would create lift. However it would only work in a straight line so not good for sideways and would have to be going quick for it to work.

Still a silly topic thou :wack:
 
scary steve said:
Matt old mate, the magazine I'm working on isn't Redline! They just happened to send me to Tokyo with Redline's editor Renton. :)

Some of you on here know EXACTLY what I'm up to, don't you chaps? :thumbs:

And no, it's not a piss-take. Creating lift over the rear wheels should theoretically make it easier to drift - hence the indepth answers.

Just because you didn't know the answer in the first place :D :D :D

Love you, miss you,

Scary

it is a total misconception by many that to drift you need a total lack of grip... you need lots of grip :nod: but... the idea is to control the ammount of grip you LET the car have.

Uplift from an inverted wing wouldnt really so at lot for drift, until you get to high speed. then you would end up with an unstable and unpredictable car :smash: not good, especially when your chucking a car about at 100mph... :wack:

I know what you upto steve, if you read my mail you'd remeber :p haha :smash: (i wasnt joking either...(about the mail content)) :D
 
It's good to have a discussion that isn't deadly serious though isnt it? I'm fed up of everyone taking drifting so seriously so cheers Steve. I read it an had a laugh :D Do tell me more about your secret project....if you need someone who can drive....call Mitto :thumbs: He's cheap
 
Driftybolox said:
It's good to have a discussion that isn't deadly serious though isnt it? I'm fed up of everyone taking drifting so seriously so cheers Steve. I read it an had a laugh :D Do tell me more about your secret project....if you need someone who can drive....call Mitto :thumbs: He's cheap

slag, you know your cheaper :smash: :wave:
 
mittomatto said:
it is a total misconception by many that to drift you need a total lack of grip... you need lots of grip :nod: but... the idea is to control the ammount of grip you LET the car have.

'Tis true :nod: ... without enought grip you can't propell the car forward in a drift.

If you wanted to go the no rear grip route then a FWD with some castors on the back would do thie trick :wack:
 
mittomatto said:
it is a total misconception by many that to drift you need a total lack of grip... you need lots of grip :nod: but... the idea is to control the ammount of grip you LET the car have.

Uplift from an inverted wing wouldnt really do at lot for drift, until you get to high speed. then you would end up with an unstable and unpredictable car :smash: not good, especially when your chucking a car about at 100mph... :wack:

exactly. :D

L.
 
In theory turning a wing upside down would cause lift, but when the back steps out the airflow to the wing will be flowing across the wing rather than over it, which will cause stalling and the lift will pretty much vanish. Also consider that the wing's side plates will now be offering a flat surface for the air pressure to act on, which will help push the car back in line.

The whole issue of a rear wing's effectiveness is a vexed one, the airflow at the back of a car is pretty messy, it takes a lot of work to get some wings to work at all, take a look at the roof of the new Evo, those diffusers are there to make that huge lump of fibreglass at the back work properly.

If there are any media types out there who want a technical editior please feel free to PM me, I see no other escape from the mindless drudge of my current job. :mad:
 
Back
Top